868. Kamāl al-dīn7: `Abd-Allah b. Ja`far al-Ḥimyarī says:
Al-shaykh Abū Ja`far Muḥammad b. `Uthmān al-`Amrī received a letter of condolence [for the death] of his father, may Allah be satisfied with them. In one part of the letter was written, “Surely, we are from Allah and to Him we will return. We submit to His commands and are satisfied with His decree. Your father lived a blissful life and died with praise. May Allah have mercy on him and unite him with his masters and friends, peace be on them. He always strived to implement their command and worked hard to do the things that would draw him closer to Allah, Mighty and Majestic be He, and to [his masters]. May Allah brighten his face and overlook his faults.”
It was written in another part, “May Allah multiply your reward and offer you the best of condolences. You are in mourning and so are we. You have become lonely by his separation and so have we. Allah will make him happy in the place where he has returned to. From amongst his good fortune was that Allah, Mighty and Majestic be He, has granted him a son like you to succeed him and take his place by His orders and to ask [Allah] to have mercy on him. [Imam Mahdī continued,] All praise is for Allah, for, the souls have become pure by your position and whatever Allah, Mighty and Majestic be He, has granted you and near you. May Allah help you, strengthen you, support you, and grant you success. Allah is your Guardian, Protector, Caretaker, and He suffices you and is your Helper.”
869. Ghaybat al-Shaykh8: A group informed me from Hārūn b. Mūsā, from Muḥammad b. Hammām, from `Abd-Allah b. Ja`far al-Ḥimyarī that “When Abū `Amr, may Allah be satisfied with him, passed away, letters came to us—with the same handwriting that we used when corresponding with him—concerning the appointment of Abū Ja`far, may Allah be satisfied with him, as his successor.”
870. Ghaybat al-Shaykh9: (Through the same chain of narrators) from Muḥammad b. Hammām, from Muḥammad b. Ḥammawayh b. `Abd al-`Azīz al-Rāzī in the year 280 AH, from Muḥammad b. Ibrāhīm b. Mahziyār al-Ahwāzī that he received [a letter] after Abū `Amr’s death that said:
The son—may Allah protect him—was always considered reliable by us during the lifetime of his father, may Allah be satisfied with and satisfy him and brighten his face. He is like his father and has his position. He ordered his son by our command and acted accordingly; May Allah guard him. Obey him and tell others about our attitude towards him.
871. Kamāl al-dīn10: Abū Ja`far Muḥammad b. `Alī al-Aswad, may Allah be satisfied with him, narrated to us that Abū Ja`far al-`Amrī dug a grave for himself and leveled it with teakwood. I asked him about it and he replied, “For people, there are causes.” I asked him again and he replied, “I have been ordered to gather my affairs.” He died two months after this incident; May Allah be satisfied with him.
872. Kamāl al-dīn11: Muḥammad b. `Alī b. Mattīl, from his uncle Ja`far b. Muḥammad b. Mattīl who said:
Abū Ja`far Muḥammad b. `Uthmān al-Sammān—known as al-`Amrī, may Allah be satisfied with him—summoned me and gave me some small clothes with signs [on them] and a purse filled with dirhams.
He said, “It is necessary that you travel alone to Wāsiṭ right now and hand these over to the first person who comes to you when you dismount on the beach of Wāsiṭ.” This made me extremely sorrowful and I said to myself, “A person like me is being sent for a mission like this and made to carry such an insignificant thing.” Anyhow, I went to Wāsiṭ and dismounted and asked the first person who met me about al-Ḥasan b. Muḥammad b. Qaṭāt al-Ṣaidalānī, the person in charge of endowments (wakīl al-waqf) at Wāsiṭ. He said, “That’s me. Who are you?” I replied, “I am Ja`far b. Muḥammad b. Mattīl.”
He recognized me with my name and greeted me. I greeted him too and we embraced each other. I said to him, “Abū Ja`far al-`Amrī has conveyed his greetings to you and handed me these clothes and this purse to give to you.” He replied, “All Praise is for Allah; Muḥammad b. `Abd-Allah al-Ḥā’irī [al-`Āmirī] has died and I had come to prepare his shroud.” He opened the parcel and in it were the necessary things for shrouding. The purse contained camphor and the wage of the bier-carriers and the grave-digger. We participated in his funeral procession and I returned.
873. Ghaybat al-Shaykh12: Al-Ḥusayn b. Ibrāhīm, from Abū Nūḥ, from Abū Naṣr Hibat-Allah b. Muḥammad, from his (maternal) uncle Abū Ibrāhīm Ja`far b. Aḥmad al-Naubakhtī, from his father Aḥmad b. Ibrāhīm, his uncle Abū Ja`far `Abd-Allah b. Ibrāhīm, and a group of his family members—i.e. the tribe of Naubakht, that
When the condition of Abū Ja`far al-`Amrī worsened, he gathered a group of influential Shiites including Abū `Alī b. Hammām, Abū `Abd-Allah b. Muḥammad al-Kātib, Abū `Abd-Allah al-Bāqaṭānī, Abū Sahl Ismā’īl b. `Alī al-Naubakhtī, Abū `Abd-Allah b. al-Wajnā, and other influential figures and elders. They all came to Abū Ja`far, may Allah be satisfied with him, and asked him, “If (the inevitable—meaning death) happens, who will be your successor?”
He replied, “He—meaning Abū l-Qāsim al-Ḥusayn b. Rauḥ b. Abī Baḥr al-Naubakhtī—will take my place. He is the ambassador between you and Ṣāḥib al-Amr, peace be on him. He is the representative and the reliable and trustworthy. Refer to him in your affairs and seek help from him in important issues. I have been ordered [to convey] this and indeed, I conveyed.”
874. Ghaybat al-Shaykh13: A theologian (mutakallim) known as Turk al-Harawī asked [Ḥusayn b. Rauḥ], “How many daughters did the Messenger of Allah have?” He replied, “Four.” He said, “Who amongst them was the most superior?” He replied, “Fāṭima, peace be on her.” He said, “How did she become the most superior while she was the youngest of them and had accompanied the Messenger of Allah, Allah’s blessings be on him and his family, less than them?” He replied, “Due to two characteristics with which Allah had distinguished her and given to her as an advantage, honor, and reverence: First, she inherited from the Messenger of Allah, Allah’s blessings be on him and his family, whilst none of his other children inherited from him.
Second, Allah the Exalted, preserved the generation of the Messenger of Allah, Allah’s blessings be on him and his family, through her and not through his other children. He did not distinguish her with these [characteristics] except due to the excellence of the purity He had known of her intention.” Al-Harawī replied [in astonishment], “I have never seen anyone speak and reply in this context better and more concise than him.”
875. Ghaybat al-Shaykh14: A group informed me from Abū `Abd-Allah al-Ḥusayn b. `Alī b. al-Ḥusayn b. Mūsā b. Bābawayh, from a group of his townsmen who lived in Baghdad—in the year in which the Qarāmiṭa attacked the hajis and it was the year of the falling stars—that “My father, may Allah be satisfied with him, wrote to al-Shaykh Abū l-Qāsim al-Ḥusayn b. Rauḥ, may Allah be satisfied with him, to seek permission to perform Hajj.
He received the reply, ‘Don’t go this year.’ He wrote again asking, ‘It is an obligatory vow (nadhr). Is it permissible for me not to go?’ The response was, ‘If you have no choice [because it is obligatory], then go with the last caravan.’ He joined the last caravan and was saved whilst those who had gone in the earlier caravans were killed.”
876. Kamāl al-dīn15: From Muḥammad b. Ibrāhīm b. Isḥāq al-Ṭāliqānī, may Allah be satisfied with him, who said:
I was with Shaykh Abū l-Qāsim al-Ḥusayn b. Rauḥ, may Allah sanctify his soul, with a group—amongst whom was `Alī b. `Īsā al-Qaṣrī. A man stood up and said to [al-Ḥusayn b. Rauḥ], “I want to ask you something.” He replied, “Ask whatever comes to your mind.” He asked, “Inform me about al-Ḥusayn b. `Alī, peace be on him; was he a guardian [appointed] by Allah?” He replied in the affirmative.
The man said, “Was his killer an enemy of Allah?” He replied in the affirmative. The man said, “Is it permissible that Allah, Mighty and Majestic be He, allows His enemy to dominate His friend?” Abū l-Qāsim al-Ḥusayn b. Rauḥ—may Allah sanctify his soul—replied, “Understand what I am telling you. Know that Allah, Mighty and Majestic be He, does not address the people [in a way that] the eyes can witness nor does He converse with speech. Rather, He—Majestic is His Majesty—sent to them messengers from their species and their kind, who were humans like them.
Had He sent to them Messengers from other than their kind and their forms, they would have certainly fled from [the messengers] and would have not accepted [their claims’]. When they came to them while they were from their species who ate food and walked in the markets, the people said to them, ‘You are mortals like us. We will not accept [what you claim] until you perform for us a thing which we cannot do.
Only then will we know that you are the chosen ones instead of us because [you can perform] what we are incapable of.’ So, Allah, Mighty and Majestic be He, gave them miracles which the people were incapable of performing. Some of them brought the storm—after warning and cautioning—and drowned all those who oppressed and rebelled.
From them was he who was thrown in the fire which became cold and safe for him. From them was he who brought forth a she-camel from solid stone and made milk to flow from its udders. From them was the one for whom the sea was split and springs flowed for him from a stone and a dry cane was turned into a snake for him that devoured their lies.
From them was the one who cured the blind and the leper, gave life to the dead with the permission of Allah, and informed them of what they ate and stored in their houses. From them was the one for whom the moon was split and with whom the animals like the camel, the wolf, and etc. spoke. When they performed such [miracles] and the people were helpless from performing the like of such deeds, Allah, Mighty and Majestic be He, ordained by His grace upon His servants and His wisdom, that He make His Prophets, peace be on them—with all their powers and miracles—at times victorious and at other times defeated; at times triumphant and at other times suppressed.
Had Allah, Mighty and Majestic be He, made them victorious and triumphant on all occasions and had not afflicted them nor tested them [by these defeats], certainly the people would have taken them as Gods instead of Allah, Mighty and Majestic be He, and their excellent patience during calamities, misfortunes, and tests would have remained unknown [to the people]. But He, Mighty and Majestic be He, made them in these situations like [ordinary people], so that they would be patient and forbearing during ordeals and calamities, grateful in times of safety and domination over the enemies, and humble in all conditions and not proud and arrogant.
Thus, the people would know that they, peace be on them, have a Lord Who is their creator and planner and [as a result, the people] would worship Him and obey His Messengers. Hence, the proof of Allah would be established against those who exceed the limits concerning them and view them as deities, or disobey, oppose, defy, and refute what the Messengers and Prophets, peace be on them, have brought. ‘So that he who perishes, perishes by clear proof, and he who lives, lives by clear proof.’16”
(Muḥammad b. Ibrāhīm b. Isḥāq, may Allah be satisfied with him, says), The next day, I returned to Shaykh Abū l-Qāsim b. Rauḥ, may Allah sanctify his soul, and was saying to myself, “Did he make up what he said to us yesterday?” He initiated [the conversation] and said, “O Muḥammad b. Ibrāhīm! It is more preferable for me to fall from the sky, and then have a bird snatch me or the wind carry me away to a barren land, than to say my own opinion or something from myself in the religion of Allah, Mighty and Majestic be He. Rather, [what I said] was from the [true] source and was heard from the Ḥujja, blessings and salutations of Allah be on him.”
877. Ghaybat al-Shaykh17: A group informed us from Abū `Abd-Allah al-Ḥusayn b. `Alī b. Bābawayh al-Qummī, from a group of people from Qum—whom `Alī b. Bābawayh was amongst—from another group of people from Qum, amongst whom were `Imrān al-Ṣaffār, his relative `Alawiyyat al-Ṣaffār, and al-Ḥusayn b. Aḥmad b. `Alī b. Aḥmad b. Idrīs, may Allah have mercy on them all, who all narrated:
We were in Baghdad in the year that Abū `Alī b. al-Ḥusayn b. Mūsā b. Bābawayh died. Abū l-Ḥasan `Alī b. Muḥammad al-Samurī, may his soul be sanctified, continuously asked us [who were] close to him about `Alī b. al-Ḥusayn, may Allah have mercy on him, and we always answered, “A letter has reached us about his wellbeing.”
The day when [`Alī b. al-Ḥusayn] died, he asked us about him and we gave him the same answer but he said, “May Allah reward you concerning `Alī b. al-Ḥusayn. He has just died.” We recorded the hour, date, and month of [his death] and after about seventeen or eighteen days, news reached us that he had died at the exact time mentioned by shaykh Abū l-Ḥasan, may his soul be sanctified.
878. Kamāl al-dīn18: From Abū Muḥammad al-Ḥasan b. Aḥmad al-Mukattib, who said:
I was in Baghdad in the year that shaykh `Alī b. Muḥammad al-Samurī, may Allah sanctify his soul, died. I went to him a few days prior to his death. He brought a letter for the people which I made a copy from that read, “In the Name of Allah, the Beneficent, the Merciful. O `Alī b. Muḥammad al-Samurī! May Allah increase the reward of your brothers concerning you! You will die within six days, so, wrap up your affairs and don’t appoint anyone as your successor after your death because the second occultation has commenced.
There will be no reappearance except after Allah’s permission, Mighty and Majestic be He, and this will happen after a long time has passed and the hearts will have become hard, and the earth will have been filled with injustice. Some of my followers will claim to have met me. Beware! Whoever claims to have met me before the emergence of the Sufyānī and the [heavenly] cry (al-ṣaiḥa) is a lying slanderer. There is no power and strength except through Allah, the Exalted and the Great.”
We copied this letter and left him. On the sixth day, we returned to him while he was on his death bed. Someone asked him, “Who is your successor?” He replied, “For Allah is an affair which he will take to its extent.” Saying this, he passed away; may Allah be satisfied with him. These were the last words [anyone] heard from him.
879. Ghaybat al-Shaykh19: Muḥammad b. Muḥammad b. al-Nu`mān and al-Ḥusayn b. `Ubaid-Allah informed me from Abū `Abd-Allah Aḥmad b. Muḥammad al-Ṣafwānī, who said:
Al-Shaykh Abū l-Qāsim, may Allah be satisfied with him, willed to Abū l-Ḥasan `Alī b. Muḥammad al-Samurī, may Allah be satisfied with him. Thus, he took his place and performed Abū l-Qāsim’s duties. When he was about to die, the Shias gathered around him and asked him about the representative after him and his successor. He had said nothing about it and had mentioned that he was not ordered to will to anyone after himself about this matter.
880. Rijāl al-Kashī20: Ja`far b. Ma’rūf al-Kashī who said, “Abū `Abd-Allah al-Balkhī wrote to me and narrated from al-Ḥusayn b. Rauḥ al-Qummī that Aḥmad b. Isḥāq wrote to [the Mahdī, peace be on him] to seek permission for Hajj. Permission was granted and a cloth was sent to him. Aḥmad b. Isḥāq said, ‘He has informed me about my death.’ He died at Ḥulwān after returning from Hajj.”
The traditions with the following numbers also show the above concept: 789, 793, 811, 812, 821, 822, 825, 849, and 861.
Notes:
1. Know that during the minor occultation, his representatives (wukalā’) and his deputies (nuwwāb) were a number of people who were known for their reliability, trustworthiness, and truthfulness. This can be verified by referring to credible books. His letters (tauqī`āt) and orders were transmitted through them. They demonstrated extraordinary acts and told of the unseen—by the assistance of their master, peace be on him. I will make this short by only speaking about the four most famous ones whose trustworthiness, justice, elevated position, and high status is agreed upon by all the Shias:Al-Shaykh Abū `Amr `Uthmān b. Sa`īd al-`Amrī, may Allah the Exalted be satisfied with him: He was appointed by Imams Abū l-Ḥasan `Alī b. Muḥammad al-`Askarī and Abū Muḥammad al-Ḥasan b. `Alī al-`Askarī, peace be on them. He was from the Banī-Asad tribe and was known as al-`Askarī and also al-Sammān (meaning the oil trader) because he traded cooking oil as a cover-up for his activities. The two aforementioned Imams have spoken about him as well as our master Ṣāḥib al-Zamān, Allah’s blessings be on him. Al-Ṭūsī has mentioned him in his Rijāl book amongst the companions of Imam al-Hādī, peace be on him. He writes, “Uthmān b. Sa`īd al-`Amrī, whose epithet is Abū `Amr al-Sammān and who is also known as al-Zayyāt. He served him when he was merely eleven years old and was famous for his inclination towards him.” Al-Ṭūsī also mentions him as a companion of (Imam) Abū Muḥammad al-Ḥasan al-`Askarī, peace be on him. He says, “Highly honored, reliable, and his representative.” Yet again, he writes: “Muḥammad b. Uthmān b. Sa`īd al-`Amrī whose epithet was Abū Ja`far and his father’s epithet was Abū `Amr; both of them were the representatives of Ṣāḥib al-Zamān, peace be on him, and enjoyed a great position amongst the Shias.” The author of Tanqīḥ al-maqāl writes, “He was more majestic and famous than can mentioned.”
Abū Ja`far Muḥammad b. Uthmān b. Sa`īd al-`Amrī: When his father—Abū `Amr—died, he replaced him by [Imam] Abū Muḥammad’s order as well as the order of his own father which was commanded by the Qā’im, peace be on him. Al-Ṭūsī has narrated in al-Ghayba from Abū l-`Abbās from Hibat-Allah b. Muḥammad, from his teachers, that the Shias are unanimous in his justice, reliability, and trustworthiness because of the statements regarding his justice and the order to refer to him during the lifetime of (Imam) al-Ḥasan (al-`Askarī), peace be on him, and after his death while his father was alive. He writes, “Numerous arguments [in support of Shia] have been narrated from him and the miracles of the Imam have been manifested at his hands . . .”
The author of Tanqīḥ al-Maqāl writes, “His majesty, high position, and status is so famous amongst the Imāmiyya that there is no need to mention it . . .” He had written some books using what he had directly heard from (Imam) Abū Muḥammad al-Ḥasan and from the Master, peace be on them, and what he had heard from his father, Uthmān b. Sa`īd, from (Imams) Abū Muḥammad and al-Ḥasan al-Hādī, peace be on them. Al-Ṭūsī writes in al-Ghayba, “Abū Naṣr Hibat-Allah says, ‘I saw in the writings of Abū Ghālib al-Zurārī—may Allah have mercy on him and forgive him—that Abū Ja`far Muḥammad b. Uthmān al-`Amrī died in the end of (the month) Jumād al-Aulā, 305 AH. Abū Naṣr Hibat-Allah b. Muḥammad b. Aḥmad has mentioned that Abū Ja`far al-`Amrī, may Allah be satisfied with him, died in the year 304 AH. He was in charge of these affairs for almost fifty years. The people took their wealth to him and he would give them signed letters which had the same handwriting as those which they received during the lifetime of (Imam) al-Ḥasan (al-`Askarī), peace be on him. [The letters] were about the difficulties [encountered] in religious and worldly matters and replies to questions they had asked him and comprised of amazing answers. May Allah be satisfied with him and satisfy him.’”
Al-Shaykh Abū al-Qāsim al-Ḥusayn b. Rauḥ b. Abū Baḥr al-Naubakhtī, may Allah have mercy on him: He attained the position of special deputyship after Muḥammad b. Uthmān, may Allah have mercy on them. He succeeded Muḥammad b. `Uthmān by the orders of the Imam which were transmitted by Muḥammad b. `Uthmān. He was viewed by both Shias and Sunnis as one of the wisest of the people and enjoyed a great position and elevated status amongst the latter too. Muḥammad b. Uthmān had about ten close confidants; Abū l-Qāsim b. Rauḥ was amongst them but the others were closer to Muḥammad b. Uthmān than him. Amongst these, Ja`far b. Aḥmad b. Mattīl was so close to him and spent so much time in his house that the Shias had no doubt that if something happened to al-Ḥusayn b. Rauḥ, he would surely inherit his position. When the Imam appointed Abū l-Qāsim, no one denied and they all submitted [to this order] including Ja`far b. Aḥmad b. Mattīl who showed the same attitude towards him which he had showed towards Abū Ja`far al-`Amrī. He continued this manner until he passed away. Shaykh Abū l-Qāsim died in the month of Sha`bān, 326 AH. The duration of his ambassadorship was twenty-one or twenty-two years. May Allah be satisfied with him
Al-Shaykh Abū l-Ḥasan `Alī b. Muḥammad al-Samurī: He succeeded Shaykh Abū l-Qāsim by his order and he was the last representative. With his death, the major occultation commenced and the affair was delegated to the jurists and those who possessed the traditions and sciences of the Ahl al-Bait, peace be on them. During the major occultation, the people must refer to them. This is a fact which has been established by numerous traditions—some of which have already been mentioned. Abū l-Ḥasan `Alī b. Muḥammad al-Samurī passed away in 329 AH; may Allah have mercy on him.
2. Ghaybat al-Shaykh, chap. “Ṭarafun min akhbār al-sufarā’,” pp. 354–355, no. 315; Biḥār al-anwār, vol. 51, chap. 16, pp. 344–345.
3. Ghaybat al-Shaykh, chap. “Ṭarafun min akhbār al-sufarā’,” p. 355, no. 315; Biḥār al-anwār, vol. 51, chap. 16, pp. 345.
4. Ghaybat al-Shaykh, chap. “Ṭarafun min akhbār al-sufarā’,” pp. 355–356, no. 317; Biḥār al-anwār, vol. 51, chap. 16, pp. 345.
5. Ghaybat al-Shaykh, chap. “Ṭarafun min akhbār al-sufarā’,” pp. 355–356, no. 318. He says on page 320 that Abū Naṣr Hibat-Allah b. Muḥammad said, “Uthmān’s grave is on the western side of Baghdad at the beginning of Mayadān Street in the place known as the gate of Jibilla in the right section of the mosque of al-Darb. The grave is located in Qibla side of the mosque itself—may Allah have mercy on him. Muḥammad b. al-Ḥasan—the author of this book—says, ‘I saw his grave in the aforementioned place. A wall was built on its side and the prayer-niche was built on its other side. There was a door on one side which opened into the place of the grave in a dark narrow room. We used to visit it publicly during my stay in Baghdad from the year 408 to after 430 AH. Then, the chief, Abū Manṣūr Muḥammad b. Faraj, broke down the wall, raised the grave to ground level and built a box on top of it which was beneath the roof. Whoever wanted to visit his grave would go there and do so. The neighbors of the area sought blessings by visiting it and used to say, “He was a righteous man” or “He was the son of (Imam) Ḥusayn’s nurse,” while they were ignorant of the reality and it is still the same today which is the year 447 AH.’”; Biḥār al-anwār, vol. 51, chap. 16 p. 346.
6. Al-Kāfī, chap. “The names of those who have seen him,” pp. 329–330; Ghaybat al-Shaykh, chap. “Ṭarafun min akhbār al-sufarā’,” pp. 359–361, no. 317, and chap. “Wilādat Ṣāḥib al-Amr `alayhi al-salām,” pp. 243¬–244, no. 209; Biḥār al-anwār, vol. 51, chap. 16, pp. 347–348.
7. Kamāl al-dīn, vol. 2, chap. 45, p. 510, no. 41; Ghaybat al-Shaykh, chap. “Ṭarafun min akhbār al-sufarā’,” p. 361, no. 323, through his chain of narrators from `Abd-Allah b. Ja`far; al-Kharā’ij wa l-jarā’iḥ, vol. 3, p. 1112, no. 28; Biḥār al-anwār, vol. 51, chap. 16, pp. 348–349; al-Iḥtijāj, vol. 2, pp. 300–301.
8. Ghaybat al-Shaykh, chap. “Ṭarafun min akhbār al-sufarā’,” p. 362, no. 324; Biḥār al-anwār, vol. 51, chap. 16, p. 349, no. 2.
9. Ghaybat al-Shaykh, chap. “Ṭarafun min akhbār al-sufarā’,” p. 362, no. 325; Biḥār al-anwār, vol. 51, chap. 16, p. 349, no. 2.
10. Kamāl al-dīn, vol. 2, chap. 45, p. 502, no. 29; Ghaybat al-Shaykh, chap. “Ṭarafun min akhbār al-sufarā’,” pp. 365–366, no. 333, from ibn Bābawayh, from a group; al-Kharā’ij wa l-jarā’iḥ, vol. 3, p. 1120, no. 36; Biḥār al-anwār, vol. 51, chap. 16, pp. 351–352, under the fourth tradition; Ithbāt al-hudāt, vol. 3, chap. 33, p. 677, no. 74; I`lām al-warā, p. 422.
11. Kamāl al-dīn, vol. 2, chap. 45, p. 504, no. 35; al-Kharā’ij wa l-jarā’iḥ, p. 1119, no. 35; Ithbāt al-hudāt, vol. 7, chap. 33, pp. 314–315, no. 79; Biḥār al-anwār, vol. 51, chap. 15, pp. 336–337, no. 63.
12. Ghaybat al-Shaykh, chap. “Ṭarafun min akhbār al-sufarā’,” pp. 371–372, no. 342; Biḥār al-anwār, chap. 16, p. 355, no. 6.
13. Ghaybat al-Shaykh, chap. “Ṭarafun min akhbār al-sufarā’,” p. 388, no. 353; Biḥār al-anwār, vol. 43, chap. 2, p. 37, under no. 40. He has recorded Buzl al-Harawī; al-Manāqib, vol. 3, chap. “Virtues of Fāṭimat al-Zahrā, peace be on her,” pp. 323¬–324, which also mentions Buzl al-Hirawī. This is probably a scribal error. According to the traditionists, al-Fīrūz Ābādī, the correct name is Badīl b. Aḥmad al-Harawī.
14. Ghaybat al-Shaykh, p. 322, no. 270; Biḥār al-anwār, vol. 51, chap. 51, p. 293, no. 1; Ithbāt al-hudāt, vol. 3, chap. 33, p. 692, no. 110.
15. Kamāl al-dīn, vol. 2, chap. 45, pp. 507–509, no. 37; Ghaybat al-Shaykh, pp. 321–322, no. 269, and pp. 324–326, no. 273; Biḥār al-anwār, vol. 44, chap. 33, pp. 273–274, no. 1; `Ilal al-sharā’i`, vol. 1, chap. 177, pp. 241–243, no. 1; al-Iḥtijāj (Beirut), vol. 2, pp. 285–288 and pp. 471–¬473.
16. Quran 8:42.
17. Ghaybat al-Shaykh, pp. 395–396, no. 366. In some copies, the word companion instead of close has been used; Kamāl al-dīn, vol. 2, chap. 45, p. 503, no. 32; Rijāl al-Najāshī, p. 262, no. 684; Faraj al-mahmūm, p. 130; I`lām al-warā, chap. 3, sect. 2, pp. 422–423; Ithbāt al-hudāt, vol. 3, sect. 12, chap. 33, p. 693, no. 113, which has recorded Harthamat b. al-`Alawiyya; Biḥār al-anwār, vol. 51, chap. 16, p. 361, no. 8; al-Kharā’ij wa l-jarā’iḥ, vol. 3, p. 1128, no. 45, which is a shorter account.
18. Kamāl al-dīn, vol. 2, chap. 45, p. 516, no. 44; Ghaybat al-Shaykh, p. 395, no. 365; I`lām al-warā, fourth rukn, part 2, chap. 3, sect. 2, which says: soon my followers will come; al-Kharā’ij wa l-jarā’iḥ (Mu’assisat al-Imām al-Mahdī), vol. 3, p. 1128, no. 6; Biḥār al-anwār, vol. 51, chap. 16, pp. 360–361, no. 7; Jannat al-ma’wā (printed with the 53rd volume of Biḥār al-anwār), p. 318.
I say: In some copies of Kamāl al-dīn and other books, it has been written, “the complete (al-tāmma) occultation has commenced.” The original printed copy of Ghaybat al-Shaykh mentions, “[people] will come to some of my followers.” Al-Kharā’ij and Jannat al-ma’wā have recorded “and from amongst my followers some will claim,” and other books have narrated “and amongst my followers.” It might be said that this letter apparently contradicts numerous, consecutive, and definite reports that cannot be enumerated due to their abundance and are an indication that the Imam was seen and some people had the privilege of being in his presence. It also contradicts the unanimous belief of the Shias—including the belief of al-Ṣadūq, the narrator of this story—about a large group of people who have met him. The scholars have mentioned a few reasons to resolve this contradiction or to reply to this question. Six of these answers have been mentioned in Jannat al-ma’wā. One of them is what a few scholars have stated and has also been stated by al-Majlisī in Biḥār al-anwār: The context of the tradition indicates that what is meant by seeing him, is a seeing accompanied by the claim of representation and ambassadorship and the conveying of news from him to the Shias—as was the prevalent practice during the minor occultation. This probability is highly likely. Another justification is that this tradition is a single and weak narration that neither its narrator—al-Ṣadūq—nor our other Shia companions have acted upon. Hence, the many incidents which certainty is obtained from are not contradicted. Rather, some of them comprise of miracles and extraordinary deeds that could not have been performed by anyone but him.
Ithbāt al-hudāt, vol. 3, sect. 3, chap. 33, p. 693, no. 112 (short version); al-Iḥtijāj (Beirut), vol. 2, p. 478.
19. Ghaybat al-Shaykh, p. 394, no. 363; Biḥār al-anwār, vol. 51, chap. 16, p. 360; I`lām al-warā, chap. 3, sect. 1, p. 417.
20. Rijāl al-Kashī (Jāmi`at al-Mashhad), p. 557, no. 1052; Ithbāt al-hudāt, vol. 7, sect. 12, chap. 33, p. 363, no. 148; Mu`jam rijāl al-ḥadīth, vol. 2, p. 49, no. 433; Biḥār al-anwār, vol. 51, chap. 15, p. 306, no. 21.